Appellant was tried and convicted under an indictment charging, in one count, that he did "unlawfully possess, deliver, sell, offer for sale, barter, or give away," marijuana.
The legal sufficiency of the indictment was not challenged in any manner. The failure to allege the name of the purchaser did not render the indictment fatally defective. Duin v. State, Ala.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
