1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 257 So.2d
  5. 257 So.2d 299 (1972)
 

LUSTIG v. FEINBERG

No. Q-165.

257 So.2d 299 (1972)

Seymour LUSTIG and Leona Benioff, Appellants, v. Bernard FEINBERG et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 3, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eli H. Subin, and Emery H. Rosenbluth, Jr., of Roth, Segal & Levine, Orlando, for appellants.

Robert W. Tongue, Forth Walton Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order deleting Bernard Feinberg and Max Seigel as party defendants for the reason that service of process was not perfected upon them.

It appears from the record that the Statutory Mechanics in perfecting service of process on the individual non-residents, Feinberg and Seigel, pursuant to the "long arm" statutes (F.S. § 48.161-48.19, F.S.A.) were complied with. The question to be decided by this court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases