1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 456 F.2d
  5. 456 F.2d 98 (1972)
 

BERARDI v. PURE OIL CORPORATION

No. 71-1611.

456 F.2d 98 (1972)

Liberi P. BERARDI et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The PURE OIL CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 14, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Schulman, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants; C.D. Lambros, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief.

Dennis D. Grant, Columbus, Ohio, for defendants-appellees; Bricker, Evatt, Barton & Eckler, Columbus, Ohio, John H. Gherlein and Daniel W. Hammer, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief.

Before CLARK, Associate Justice, and McCREE and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants filed a complaint in the District Court that purported to assert three "causes of action." The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted but allowed appellants leave to amend to cure defects that the court specifically noted. Appellants then filed an amended complaint, which the court again dismissed for the reason that appellants had not complied sufficiently with the court's orders and thus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases