1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 344 F.Supp.
  5. 344 F.Supp. 210 (1972)
 

DUNNELL v. AUSTIN

No. 37533.

344 F.Supp. 210 (1972)

Mildred DUNNELL et al., Plaintiffs, and John B. Bruff et al., Intervening Plaintiffs, v. Richard H. AUSTIN, Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

May 31, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Foster, Lindemer, Swift & Collins, Lansing, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Russell A. Searl and Solomon Bienenfeld, Lansing, Mich., for defendant Richard H. Austin.

Theodore Sachs, Detroit, Mich., for defendant Bruff.

OPINION

KEITH, District Judge.

This is a suit to compel valid redistricting of Michigan's nineteen Congressional Districts in the light of the 1970 U. S. decennial census.

On December 10, 1971, plaintiffs Dunnell, Fletcher, Haynes and Lyle brought suit to challenge the existing Congressional districting of the State of Michigan, Act 282, Public Acts of Michigan of 1964, being M.C.L.A. § 3.51, M.S.A. § 4.24(1), and to seek judicial relief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases