STATE v. ELKINTON

No. State 107.

56 Wis.2d 497 (1972)

202 N.W.2d 28

STATE, Appellant, v. ELKINTON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 28, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Burleigh A. Randolph, district attorney of La Crosse county.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Marvin H. Davis of La Crosse.


ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

The defendant contends, and the trial court agreed, that granting the defense motion for a mistrial precluded the state from proceeding in a new trial on the same charge. This would make the granting of a motion for mistrial in a criminal case the exact equivalent, in its implications and consequences, of an acquittal. That is not the law, and never has been.

Before the trial court and on appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases