CONNECTICUT ACTION NOW. INC. v. ROBERTS PLATING CO.

No. 255, Docket 71-1674.

457 F.2d 81 (1972)

CONNECTICUT ACTION NOW, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROBERTS PLATING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided March 21, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Beizer, New Haven, Conn., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Charles J. Negaro, Waterbury, Conn., for defendant-appellee.

Shiro Kashiwa, Asst. Atty. Gen., Edmund B. Clark, and Bernie Rothbaum, Jr., Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for the United States, amicus curiae.

Before FRIENDLY, Chief Judge, FEINBERG, Circuit Judge, and DAVIS, Judge.


DAVIS, Judge:

This is the eighth recorded attempt in the last year or two by environmentalists to have a federal court hold that private persons may sue in qui tam for fines under §§ 13 and 16 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. §§ 407, 411, even though the Department of Justice fails or refuses to proceed under those provisions. The previous decisions have all been adverse,1 as was the ruling below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases