PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a conviction for aggravated robbery, Minn.St. 609.245, following a trial by jury, and from the order of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial. The two grounds for appeal are that the evidence does not support the verdict and that the prosecutor's closing argument was so improper as to be prejudicial. A review of the testimony shows that ample evidence supported the jury's verdict.
The closing argument by the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.