1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 263 So.2d
  5. 263 So.2d 253 (1972)
 

COSENTINO v. ELSON

No. 72-41.

263 So.2d 253 (1972)

Alfred A. COSENTINO and David B. Gam, d/b/a Cosentino and Gam, Engineers, Appellants, v. Jerome ELSON and Heiman and Crary, P.A., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 20, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Ramer, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Heiman & Crary and Charles L. Neustein, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the trial court, here under review, be and the same is hereby affirmed. Funds in escrow are not subject to garnishment [see: 6 Am.Jur.2d, Attachment and Garnishment, § 125; 28 Am.Jur.2d, Escrow, § 10; 38 C.J.S. Garnishment § 77c(1); Anno. 10 A.L.R. 741] except where all conditions of the escrow had been completed and the funds without dispute are due to a judgment debtor.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases