UNSAT. C. & J. FUND BD. v. FORTNEY

[No. 159, September Term, 1971.]

264 Md. 246 (1972)

285 A.2d 641

UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD ET AL. v. FORTNEY ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 18, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evan Crossley, with whom were Crossley, Latimer & Robinson on the brief, for Mark J. Haselbauer, part of appellants. Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and William E. Brannan, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, for Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board, other appellant.

Ernest V. Wachs, with whom were Wachs & Kreykenbohm on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.


SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Board) complains because it was ordered to pay appellees, Frances M. Fortney et al., (Fortney) on a default judgment obtained against appellant Mark J. Haselbauer (Haselbauer) during the time that he was in the military service, without any attempt to comply with the provisions of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 (50 U.S.C. App. § 520). Under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases