1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 496 P.2d
  5. 496 P.2d 9 (1972)
 

BALDWIN v. HAWAIIAN AGRONOMICS COMPANY

No. 5116.

496 P.2d 9 (1972)

Douglas A. BALDWIN and Edna C. Baldwin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HAWAIIAN AGRONOMICS COMPANY (International), Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

April 18, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Stifel, Honolulu (Jenks, Kidwell, Goodsill & Anderson, Honolulu, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Frank D. Padgett, Honolulu (Padgett, Greeley, Marumoto & Akinaka, Honolulu, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., ABE, LEVINSON and KOBAYASHI, JJ., and Circuit Judge CHANG in place of MARUMOTO, J., disqualified.

PER CURIAM.

In reviewing the record, as submitted to this court, it is apparent that substantial evidence is lacking in this case to sustain the factual findings of the trial court. See Ashford v. Thos. Cook & Son, Ltd., 52 Haw. 113, 123, 471 P.2d 530, 536 (1970). We are of the opinion that the trial court erred in the following:

1) Sufficient evidence is lacking to sustain a breach of contract of employment at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases