KLOPPING v. CITY OF WHITTIER

Docket Nos. L.A. 29994, 29995.

8 Cal.3d 39 (1972)

500 P.2d 1345

104 Cal. Rptr. 1

FRANK J. KLOPPING, JR., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF WHITTIER, Defendant and Respondent. CLIFFORD E. SARFF et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF WHITTIER, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

September 22, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Thomas G. Baggot, Herbert Gall, John U. Gall, Fadem & Kanner and Gideon Kanner for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Robert Flandrick, City Attorney, Martin & Flandrick and Stephen H. Galton for Defendant and Respondent. John D. Maharg, County Counsel (Los Angeles), William F. Stewart, Deputy County Counsel, Adrian Kuyper, County Counsel (Orange), Robert F. Nuttman, Assistant County Counsel, Harry S. Fenton, Joseph A. Montoya, Robert L. Meyer, Hugh R. Williams and Jack M. Miller as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

MOSK, J.

Plaintiffs Klopping and Sarff (plaintiffs) instituted separate actions in inverse condemnation for damages alleged to have been caused by activities of the City of Whittier (city) prior to the eventual condemnation of the property then owned by plaintiffs. After the trial court sustained the city's demurrers, judgments of dismissal were entered. Plaintiffs appeal.

On May 11, 1965, the city adopted a resolution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases