1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 353 F.Supp.
  5. 353 F.Supp. 124 (1972)
 

STANFORD DAILY v. ZURCHER

No. C-71 912 REP.

353 F.Supp. 124 (1972)

The STANFORD DAILY et al., Plaintiffs, v. James ZURCHER, individually and as Chief of Police of the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

October 5, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony G. Amsterdam, Stanford, Cal., Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Robert H. Mnookin, Howard, Prim, Smith, Rice & Down, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Peter G. Stone, City Atty., City of Palo Alto, Palo Alto, Cal., Melville A. Toff, Mt. View, Cal., for defendants Zurcher, Bonander, Deisinger, Martin and Peardon.

Wm. M. Siegel, County Counsel, Santa Clara County, Selby Brown, Jr., Chief Asst. County Counsel, San Jose, Cal., for defendants Phelps, Bergna and Brown.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PECKHAM, District Judge.

This is an action pursuant to 42 U.S. C. § 1983 to declare illegal and unconstitutional a search on April 12, 1971 of the offices of the Stanford Daily, the primary newspaper on the Stanford University campus. In addition to declaratory relief plaintiffs, the Stanford Daily and various members of its staff further pray for an injunction against defendants, various...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases