1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 118 N.J.
  5. 118 N.J. Super. 354 (1972)
 

BIALKOWSKI v. BOR. OF RIDGEFIELD

118 N.J. Super. 354 (1972)

287 A.2d 479

GENE M. BIALKOWSKI, PLAINTIFF, v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND GEORGE CALZA, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided February 7, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Okin, Pressler & Shapiro, attorneys for plaintiff.

Mr. Michael L. Scherby, attorney for defendants.

BRESLIN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

This matter originally came before the court on an order to show cause why plaintiff was not entitled to relief sought in his verified complaint in lieu of prerogative writs against defendants Borough of Ridgefield and George Calza. The parties have stipulated that the court now consider and decide the issue presented as counter-motions for summary judgment.

The facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases