HUME v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 623.

16 Ariz. App. 432 (1972)

494 P.2d 37

Carl W. HUME, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Truly Nolen Exterminating, Inc., Respondent Employer, Royal-Globe Insurance Co., Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

Rehearing Denied March 28, 1972.

Review Denied May 9, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard I. Rabinovitz, Tucson, for petitioner.

William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Glen D. Webster, Jr., Phoenix, for respondent carrier.


STEVENS, Presiding Judge.

This is another heart case, the type of case which must be resolved by an evaluation of the medical testimony. The problem for his Court is whether the medical evidence sustains the award. In the event of a conflict, the hearing officer, initially, and the Commission, on review, must evaluate the medical evidence. If there is medical evidence which sustains the award, the award must be affirmed.

The petitioner had been an employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases