1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 60 N.J.
  5. 60 N.J. 372 (1972)
 

IN RE DISTRICT INHERITANCE TAX SUPERVISORS

60 N.J. 372 (1972)

290 A.2d 137

IN THE MATTER OF THE DISTRICT INHERITANCE TAX SUPERVISORS, HAY REPORT APPEAL. IN THE MATTER OF STATE COLLEGE LIBRARIANS, I AND II, 10 MONTHS AND 12 MONTHS — HAY REPORT APPEAL. NICHOLAS C. MAIDA, APPELLANT, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, RESPONDENT. ROBERT MICAI, WILLIAM BROWN, ORVILLE ABBOTT, GEORGE HUTCHINSON, JOSEPH R. SMITH, JOHN SHANER AND HENRY JUSTUS, APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT. IN THE MATTER OF THE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, REPRESENTING CERTAIN PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION — HAY REPORT APPEAL. ROBERT J. BERISH, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JOHN J. FARRELL, CHIEF EXAMINER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT. HYMAN S. ABRAMSON, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JOHN J. FARRELL, CHIEF EXAMINER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT. ELIZABETH McLAUGHLIN, APPELLANT, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 24, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mrs. Marilyn Loftus Schauer, First Assistant Attorney General, argued for the Civil Service Commission (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General, attorney; Mr. David S. Litwin, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Ernest Gross argued in A-74 for the Inheritance Tax Supervisors (Messrs. Gross, Weissberger & Linett, attorneys).

Mr. William S. Greenberg argued in A-75 for the State College Librarians, in A-78 for the Professional Association, New Jersey State Department of Education, and in A-79 for Robert J. Berish, et al. (Messrs. Sterns and Greenberg, attorneys).

Mr. Mario H. Volpe argued in A-76 for Nicholas C. Maida.

Mr. Robert J. Partlow argued in A-77 for Robert Micai, William Brown, Orville Abbott, George Hutchinson, Joseph R. Smith, John Shaner, and Henry Justus (Messrs. Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys).

Mr. Joel H. Sterns argued in A-80 for Hyman S. Abramson, et al. (Messrs. Sterns and Greenberg, attorneys; Mr. William S. Greenberg, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Richard Newman argued in A-81 for Elizabeth McLaughlin.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are denied and the causes are remanded to the Appellate Division for further proceedings. See In re Senior Appeals Examiners, 60 N.J. 356 (1972).

During oral argument we were advised that some of the appellants are attacking the Commission's determinations in the federal district court as well as here. Such simultaneous proceedings entail litigious vexation and harassment; beyond that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases