1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 24 Cal.App.3d
  5. 24 Cal.App.3d 18 (1972)
 

HILL v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. 38013.

24 Cal.App.3d 18 (1972)

102 Cal. Rptr. 251

EDWARD J. HILL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

March 14, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, James A. Doherty and John Daly, Assistant City Attorneys, Siegfried O. Hillmer and Arthur D. Rutledge, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Appellants.

Brumer & Hopson and John R. Hopson for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

STEPHENS, Acting P.J. —

OPINION AFTER REHEARING

This is an appeal by defendant, City of Los Angeles, from an adverse judgment rendered in an action for declaratory relief.

The facts are that on July 10, 1941, plaintiff, Edward J. Hill, was appointed to the position of police officer for defendant city. On April 27, 1942, plaintiff Hill signed and executed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases