1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 351 F.Supp.
  5. 351 F.Supp. 63 (1972)
 

ELEOPOULOS v. RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

No. 72-1012.

351 F.Supp. 63 (1972)

Michael ELEOPOULOS et al., Plaintiffs, v. RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY and the City of Richmond, Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

November 20, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bold & Polisner, Jeffrey D. Polisner, Richmond, Cal., and Jackson, Turner, Endeman & Mulcare, with Wm. J. Turner, Burlingame, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Fitzgerald & Johnson, Herman H. Fitzgerald, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have filed an action alleging a de facto taking of their property by defendants without just compensation in violation of the 5th and 14th Amendments. Jurisdiction is alleged under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The major actions which allegedly constitute a taking are as follows: On September 8, 1959, the City Council of Richmond, California...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases