Writ refused. The judgment of the lower court is correct.
BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The ordinance appears unconstitutional on its face being over-broad in scope, ambiguous, and inconsistent and violative of First Amendment U.S. Const. See Coates v. City of Cincinnati,
TATE, J., concurs in Barham, J.'s, dissent. See also Cohen v. California, ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.