1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 6 Wn.
  5. 6 Wn. App. 385 (1972)
 

CUNNINGHAM v. KING CY. BOUNDARY BD.

No. 777-1.

6 Wn. App. 385 (1972)

493 P.2d 811

JOHN E. CUNNINGHAM et al., Appellants, v. KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD et al., Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One — Panel 2.

As amended by order March 22, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clark B. Snure, for appellants.

Slade Gorton, Attorney General, and Walter E. Webster, Jr., Special Assistant, for respondents.

[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals March 22, 1972.]

FARRIS, A.C.J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a King County Superior Court judgment dismissing with prejudice their appeal from a decision of the King County Boundary Review Board. The board's decision allowed defendant sewer district to annex approximately 87 acres after a petition for annexation, signed by the owners of 60 per cent of the area proposed to be annexed, was initiated pursuant to RCW 56.24...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases