1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 24 Cal.App.3d
  5. 24 Cal.App.3d 361 (1972)
 

ESCROW INSTITUTE OF CAL. v. PIERNO

Docket No. 38786.

24 Cal.App.3d 361 (1972)

100 Cal. Rptr. 880

ESCROW INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ANTHONY R. PIERNO, as Commissioner, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

March 27, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Conrad G. Tuohey and John A. McDermott II for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Arthur C. de Goede and Richard W. Bakke, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Fulop, Rolston, Burns & McKittrick and Morton Rosen as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

FORD, P.J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a declaratory judgment as to the constitutionality of the Escrow Law (Fin. Code, § 17000 et seq.) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (10 Cal. Admin. Code, §§ 1700-1753). (1) (See fn. 1.) The judgment, which was entered pursuant to the granting of the motion of the Commissioner of Corporations for judgment on the pleadings,1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases