1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 53 Wis.2d
  5. 53 Wis.2d 327 (1972)
 

STATE v. SCHENK

No. State 25.

53 Wis.2d 327 (1972)

193 N.W.2d 26

STATE, Respondent, v. SCHENK, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided January 4, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Stanley S. Chmiel and Chmiel & O'Connell, all of Appleton, and oral argument by Stanley S. Chmiel and John D. O'Connell.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Robert J. Vergeront, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.

The facts of this case will be set forth in considering the issues raised on this appeal, which are:

(1) Sufficiency of the evidence;

(2) Failure to give a cautionary instruction, sua sponte, as to the testimony of defendant's accomplice;

(3) Refusal to allow cross-examination of defendant's accomplice on the question of bias;

(4) The display of an exhibit before it was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases