34 & 7 REALOPP CORP. v. SEAFOOD CITY


71 Misc.2d 302 (1972)

34 & 7 Realopp Corp., Appellant, v. Seafood City, Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

May 22, 1972


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gubman & Sitomer (Joseph G. Gubman and Robert I. Edlitz of counsel), for appellant. Carb, Luria, Glassner, Cook & Kufeld (Bernard B. Sumliner of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — STREIT, J. P., QUINN and GOLD, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The failure to allege in the petition that "the premises are not a multiple dwelling" as required by the New York City Civil Court Rules (22 NYCRR 2900.21 [f]), is a defect which can be amended by motion at any time before conclusion of the trial (Rosgro Realty Co. v. Braynen, 70 Misc.2d 808; Presta v. Circle Studios, N. Y. L. J., April 7, 1972, p...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases