1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 56 Wis.2d
  5. 56 Wis.2d 299 (1972)
 

RUSECKI v. STATE

No. 26.

56 Wis.2d 299 (1972)

201 N.W.2d 832

RUSECKI, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 9, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there were briefs by Cotton, Rose & Rose and Terry W. Rose, all of Kenosha, and oral argument by Terry W. Rose.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Thomas J. Balistreri, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

WILKIE, J.

Two evidentiary questions are raised on this review:

1. Did the trial court err in not excluding Krass's testimony concerning the defendant's runaways, such information being communicated to him from the boy's parents?

2. Did the trial court err in not excluding the medical report and Krass's testimony concerning that report pursuant to sec. 885.21, Stats.?

A. Hearsay testimony.

It is the contention of defendant that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases