PAYNE v. PAYNE

No. 515-2.

7 Wn. App. 338 (1972)

498 P.2d 882

FRANKIE M. PAYNE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM D. PAYNE, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

July 18, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard W. Moen (of Hodge, Mann, Copeland & King), for appellant.

Herbert Gelman (of Overland & Gelman), for respondent.


PETRIE, C.J.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether or not an interest in a military retirement program and future benefits expected to be received thereunder constitute property distributable in a divorce proceeding. The answer is that such interest and anticipated monthly benefits cannot be distributed as property under a decree of divorce.

Upon her complaint for divorce the trial court awarded plaintiff, Frankie M. Payne, a decree of divorce...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases