CITY OF DAYTON v. CLOUD

No. 71-739.

30 Ohio St. 2d 295 (1972)

CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLEE, v. CLOUD, AUDITOR, ET AL.; MIAMI CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 28, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James W. Drake, city attorney, Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey and Mr. Alan P. Buchmann, for appellee.

Messrs. Brumbaugh, Corwin & McDonnell and Mr. Robert K. Corwin, for appellant.


STERN, J.

The issue herein is the constitutionality of R. C. Chapter 725. The pertinent facts are not in dispute.

Appellant raises four questions of law, necessitating an examination by this court of Section 2 of Article XII, and Section 2 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution. Section 2 of Article XII, to which we address ourselves first, reads, in pertinent part:

"* * * Land and improvements thereon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases