RITTER v. DANBURY

No. 612, September Term, 1971.

15 Md. App. 309 (1972)

290 A.2d 173

GAIL M. RITTER v. CHARLES DANBURY.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 27, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Josef E. Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, Raymond G. Thieme, State's Attorney for Anne Arundel County and Joseph V. Reina, Assistant State's Attorney for Anne Arundel County, on the brief, for appellant.

No brief or appearance for appellee.

The cause was argued before THOMPSON, MOYLAN and GILBERT, JJ.


GILBERT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Gail M. Ritter, appellant, has appealed from a dismissal of her paternity action brought against Charles Danbury, appellee.

This appeal presents two questions, viz.:

1. Did the trial court err in refusing to take judicial notice of the normal period of gestation?

2. Was the trial court in error in allowing appellee's then counsel to strike their appearance from the cause in contravention of Maryland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases