1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 23 Cal.App.3d
  5. 23 Cal.App.3d Supp. 9 (1972)
 

PEOPLE v. KAPLAN

Docket No. 10391.

23 Cal.App.3d Supp. 9 (1972)

100 Cal. Rptr. 372

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MURRAY KAPLAN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

February 7, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Stanley Fleishman and David M. Brown for Defendant and Appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, and Madeleine Flier, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

WHYTE, P.J.

Appellant states 21 grounds for appeal, many of which are overlapping and some (e.g., V, VI, XVIII, XX, and XXI) so vague and general as to be useless in pointing out specific grounds for reversal. In his brief he gets down to three which we may summarize as follows: (1) The book "Suite 69" is not obscene; (2) The prosecution failed to present any evidence that the book is utterly without redeeming social importance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases