MATTER OF CACCHIOLI v. HOBERMAN


31 N.Y.2d 287 (1972)

In the Matter of Robert L. Cacchioli, Respondent, v. Solomon Hoberman et al., Constituting the City Civil Service Commission et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 2, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Murray, John G. de Roos and Helen R. Cassidy for appellants.

Nathan R. Shapiro for respondent.

Judges BURKE, BERGAN and GIBSON concur with Chief Judge FULD; Judge JASEN concurs in a separate opinion in which Judges SCILEPPI and BREITEL concur.


Chief Judge FULD.

The court is unanimous in holding — as set forth in that portion of the concurring opinion denominated part I (pp. 289-293) — that the New York City Transit Authority Police Department would not have been justified in discharging the petitioner on the ground that his failure to divulge his youthful offender adjudication on his job application questionnaire did not constitute a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases