1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 30 Cal.App.3d
  5. 30 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 (1972)
 

PEOPLE v. DEEM

Docket No. 11574.

30 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 (1972)

106 Cal. Rptr. 311

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HAROLD W. DEEM, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

December 26, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Harold W. Deem, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, and Richard P. Moroney, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

WONG, J.

Appellant was convicted under section 650 of the Penal Code which reads: "Every person who knowingly and wilfully sends or delivers to another any letter or writing, whether subscribed or not, threatening to accuse him or another of a crime, or to expose or publish any of his failings or infirmities, is guilty of a misdemeanor."

The statute was enacted in 1872, but there are no reported cases passing

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases