1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 300 A.2d
  5. 300 A.2d 12 (1972)
 

HOPKINS v. CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION

300 A.2d 12 (1972)

John W. HOPKINS and Joseph Martinowski, Plaintiffs, v. CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. TEAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Delaware corporation, and Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Maryland, a corporation of the State of Maryland, Third-Party Defendants.

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle.

December 15, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Berg, of Berg, Taylor & Komissaroff, Wilmington, for plaintiffs.

Richard E. Poole, of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, for third-party defendant Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland.

OPINION

CHRISTIE, Judge.

The present action involves the question of whether an internal administrative memorandum may be discovered under Civil Rule 26, Del.C.Ann., which corresponds exactly to the Federal Rule of the same number. Production of the memorandum involved in the present dispute was requested by plaintiffs, John W. Hopkins and Joseph Martinowski from Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Maryland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases