1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 17 Ariz.
  5. 17 Ariz. App. 294 (1972)
 

MEEKS v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 642.

17 Ariz. App. 294 (1972)

497 P.2d 410

Ida Mae MEEKS, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Loo's Restaurant, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

Rehearing Denied June 7, 1972.

Review Denied July 13, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Westover, Keddie & Choules, by Douglas S. Stanley, Yuma, for petitioner.

William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel State Compensation Fund, by Harlan J. Crossman, Phoenix, for respondent carrier.

CASE, Judge.

This appeal by certiorari from an award of the Industrial Commission raises three issues.

1. Is petitioner entitled to benefits prior to the filing of a petition to reopen?

2. Are the medical costs incurred prior to the filing of a petition to reopen a reasonable and necessary expense pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1061, subsec. H?

3. Was the petition to reopen a new claim?

The facts necessary for a determination of these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases