1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 300 A.2d
  5. 300 A.2d 6 (1972)
 

HOLMES v. STATE

300 A.2d 6 (1972)

George F. HOLMES, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

November 27, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl Haller, Georgetown, for defendant below, appellant.

H. Newton White, Deputy Atty. Gen., Georgetown, for plaintiff below, appellee.

Before WOLCOTT, C. J., and CAREY and HERRMANN, JJ.

HERRMANN, Justice:

This appeal from a burglary conviction involves a violation of a rule of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).

The defendant was arrested at approximately 12:30 p. m. When first interrogated about the offense by police at headquarters, after Miranda-type warnings, the defendant repeated "no comment" in response to the questioning "at least ten or a dozen times" according...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases