HOLLAND v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. OF REV.

Appeal, No. 210 C.D. 1971.

4 Pa.Commw. 292 (1972)

Holland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

January 3, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Shomaker, with him Anthony A. Barrante and Barrante, Barrante & Shomaker, for appellant.

Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with him J. Shane Creamer, Attorney General, for appellee.

Argued October 22, 1971, before Judges KRAMER, MANDERINO and MENCER, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE MENCER, January 3, 1972:

This is an appeal from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying benefits to Doris L. Holland (claimant) under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of 1936, as amended, 43 P.S. § 802(e), which provides: "An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week — * * * (e) In which his unemployment is due to his discharge or temporary suspension from work for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases