PHILA. v. ROHM & HAAS CO., INC.

Appeal, No. 818 C.D. 1971.

5 Pa.Commw. 287 (1972)

Philadelphia v. Rohm & Haas Company, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

April 19, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis C. Johanson, with him Henry Thomas Dolan and Fein, Criden, Johanson, Dolan & Morrissey, for petitioner.

S. Jay Sklar, Assistant City Solicitor, with him John Mattioni, Deputy City Solicitor, and Levy Anderson, City Solicitor, for City of Philadelphia.

Argued February 9, 1972, before President Judge BOWMAN and Judges CRUMLISH, JR., KRAMER, WILKINSON, JR., MENCER, ROGERS and BLATT.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 1972, it appearing to the Court that there was a transposition error in the Supplemental Opinion and Order of this Court dated April 7, 1972, in the above-noted matter, it is hereby ordered that the Order of this Court dated April 7, 1972, is hereby vacated, and the Supplemental Opinion is amended to read as shown on the Supplemental Opinion attached hereto, and the Order is amended to read:

Based upon the discussion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases