DAVIS v. AANDEWIEL

No. 2 CA-CIV 1060.

16 Ariz. App. 262 (1972)

492 P.2d 758

Thomas DAVIS, Appellant, v. Arthur AANDEWIEL and Wilhelmine Aandewiel, husband and wife, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Rehearing Denied February 16, 1972.

Review Denied March 14, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russo, Cox & Dickerson, P.C., by Jerold A. Cartin, Tucson, for appellant.

J. Emery Barker, Tucson, for appellees.


KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

This appeal is taken from the summary dismissal of plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff's complaint, pursuant to Rule 8(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., set forth a "short and plain" statement of the claim. The complaint alleged: (1) the court's jurisdiction; (2) an oral agreement by plaintiff through his agent with the defendants for the sale of plaintiff's business known as the Photo Corral; (3) that defendants have taken possession of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases