1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 23 Cal.App.3d
  5. 23 Cal.App.3d 246 (1972)
 

VINOT ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CITY OF PASADENA

Docket Nos. 39270, 39570.

23 Cal.App.3d 246 (1972)

100 Cal. Rptr. 217

VINOT ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v. CITY OF PASADENA et al., Respondents. LEO BARBARICK, Petitioner, v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE PASADENA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. (Consolidated Cases.)

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

February 2, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Hecht, Diamond & Freis, Roger Jon Diamond and Virgil V. Becker for Petitioners.

Wendell R. Thompson, City Attorney, Evelynn M. Finn, Assistant City Attorney, Suzanne B. Gifford and James O. Kahan, Deputy City Attorneys, for Respondents and for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

THOMPSON, J.

Petitioner Vinot Enterprises, Inc. (Vinot) seeks a peremptory writ of mandate "restraining" the City of Pasadena (City) from "operation and execution of its decision [denying an entertainment permit to Vinot]" and "absolutely and forever restrain[ing] [the City] from taking any further proceedings against, or making any other orders affecting petitioner [Vinot]." Having initially determined that Vinot had not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases