FLOYD v. N. Y. ST. URBAN DEVELOP.


70 Misc.2d 187 (1972)

Thomas Floyd, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Resident Property Owners and Taxpayers of the Village of Ossining, Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. New York State Urban Development Corporation et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, New York County.

May 30, 1972


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Palmiston & Fiore (Andrew J. Fiore of counsel), for plaintiff. Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates (Samuel Gates, Robert J. Geniesse and Eldon V. C. Greenberg of counsel), and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Daniel M. Cohen of counsel), for New York State Urban Development Corporation, defendant.


SAMUEL J. SILVERMAN, J.

Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is denied. Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is granted to the extent of awarding judgment declaring that subdivision (3) of section 16 of the New York State Urban Development Corporation Act (L. 1968, ch. 174) is valid and constitutional insofar as it purports to exempt projects of the Urban Development Corp. from zoning laws...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases