HOWARD v. REYNOLDS

No. 71-709.

30 Ohio St. 2d 214 (1972)

HOWARD, APPELLEE, v. REYNOLDS, APPELLANT, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 31, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick and Mr. Robert B. Gosline, for appellees.

Messrs. Marshall, Melhorn, Bloch & Belt, Mr. Edward F. Weber and Mr. George F. Medill, for appellant.


HERBERT, J.

The sole question presented herein is whether the intangible personal property involved in this case should be distributed according to the law of its deceased owner's domicile or the law of the situs of the property.

It is abundantly clear that "the power to regulate the transmission, administration, and distribution of * * * personal property on the death of the owner rests with the state of its situs * * *." Frick v. Pennsylvania<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases