PHIPPS
v.
CAMPBELL, WYANT & CANNON FOUNDRY
VALT
v.
WOODALL INDUSTRIES, INC.
Michigan Court of Appeals.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 21, 1972.
Decided March 21, 1972.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Zwerdling, Miller, Klimist & Maurer, for plaintiff Valt.
John Miley (E.R. Whinham, Jr., of counsel), for defendants Woodall Industries, Inc., and Associated Indemnity Corp.
Cholette, Perkins & Buchanan (by Sherman H. Cone), for defendants Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company.
Amici Curiae:
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, American Insurance Association, American Mutual Insurance Alliance, Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Employers Mutual of Wausau, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Michigan Mutual Liability Company, and Michigan State Accident Fund, by Charles H. King.
Michigan Manufacturers Association, Michigan Road Builders' Association, Michigan Retailers Association, National Electrical Contractors' Association — Michigan Chapter, Associated Petroleum Industries of Michigan, Michigan Automobile Dealers Association, Michigan Chapter Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., Michigan Dairy Foods Association, Michigan Wine Institute, Michigan Automotive Wholesalers' Association, Michigan Trucking Association, Michigan Institute of Laundry and Drycleaning, and Michigan Food Dealers' Association, by Beaumont, Smith & Harris (by Dwight H. Vincent, J. Walker Henry, and Paul A. DePrez).
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW, by Zwerdling, Miller, Klimist & Maurer.
Michigan State Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO, and Detroit Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO, by Prebenda & Prebenda.
Before: FITZGERALD, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and HOLBROOK, JJ.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Leave to appeal granted as to Valt v Woodall Industries, Inc., 387 Mich. 796.
FITZGERALD, P.J.
In these cases, consolidated for purposes of review, leave to appeal was granted to defendants by this Court from determinations of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board. Both cases involve the Workmen's Compensation Act1 and the proper statutory interpretation to be accorded to part II, §§ 3, 9, 10, and 11 thereof. In each...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
