Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice in the Second Judicial Department on July 8, 1931. The basis of the charge of professional misconduct is that after respondent was given $10,000 for the purpose of purchasing a second mortgage on a parcel of real property he converted such sum of money to his own use without authority. In connection with this charge it is also alleged that respondent commingled $5,000 of this sum with his own personal funds. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.