Court of Appeals of Georgia.
DEEN, Judge.
The only enumeration of error argued by the defendant contends that the verdict, which is based on circumstantial evidence, is unsupported by a quantum of evidence sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis, and that, in view of Watson v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
