1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 60 N.J.
  5. 60 N.J. 160 (1972)
 

E & K AGENCY v. VAN DYKE

60 N.J. 160 (1972)

286 A.2d 706

E & K AGENCY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE VAN DYKE AND THEODORE SOFIELD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 1, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alan C. Sugarman argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. James M. Coleman, Jr., argued the cause for respondent Sofield (Messrs. Patterson, Cooper and Coleman, attorneys; Mr. R. Scott Buist, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by MOUNTAIN, J.

This case has had a long and rather complicated procedural history which must be briefly reviewed.

George W. Van Dyke and Theodore Sofield, defendants in the action, were the beneficial owners of the stock of several corporations which, in turn, owned valuable waterfront land. This property was listed for sale with the plaintiff real estate agency in March, 1965. Efforts to sell the land resulted in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases