1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 80 Wn.2d
  5. 80 Wn.2d 139 (1972)
 

DUROCHER v. KING COUNTY

No. 41919.

80 Wn.2d 139 (1972)

492 P.2d 547

BRUCE E. DUROCHER et al., Respondents and Cross-appellants, v. KING COUNTY et al., Appellants, WEYERHAEUSER PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Respondents. WEYERHAEUSER PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY et al., Appellants, BRUCE E. DUROCHER, Respondent and Cross-appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 6, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Derrill T. Bastian, for appellants King County et al.

Malcolm J. Bell and Bruce E. Durocher, for respondents and cross-appellants.

Lyle L. Iversen (of Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester), for respondents.

Montgomery, Purdue, Blankinship & Austin, amicus curiae.

STAFFORD, J.

This is an appeal from a preliminary determination by the superior court that the King County Council's act of granting an "unclassified use permit" was an administrative act not subject to referendum but that such action was void because the county council is without power, under the home rule charter, to act in an administrative capacity.

In September 1969, respondents, Weyerhaeuser Properties, Inc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases