1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 32 Ohio
  5. 32 Ohio St. 2d 185 (1972)
 

STATE v. EVANS

Nos. 72-33 and 72-163.

32 Ohio St. 2d 185 (1972)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. EVANS, APPELLANT. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MARTIN, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 15, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George C. Smith, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. C. William Brownfield, Jr., for appellee in case No. 72-33.

Mr. Roy F. Martin, for appellant in case No. 72-33.

Mr. Stephan M. Gabalac, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Charles E. Grisi and Mr. Stanley P. Aronson, for appellee in case No. 72-163.

Mr. Albert S. Rakas, for appellant in case No. 72-163.

Per Curiam.

The first question is whether the police photographs, admitted as evidence in both trials, constituted prejudicial error.

Police identification markings characterized each picture. They were double-shot in nature, having front and profile views of appellants. The latter maintain that these pictures prejudiced the jury, citing State v. Breedlove (1971), 26 Ohio St.2d 178. The second...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases