1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 26 Cal.App.3d
  5. 26 Cal.App.3d 186 (1972)
 

HOLLISTER CANNING CO. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 30831.

26 Cal.App.3d 186 (1972)

102 Cal. Rptr. 713

HOLLISTER CANNING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BENITO COUNTY, Respondent; JAMES E. SWETT, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

June 20, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wyckoff, Parker, Boyle & Pope and Charles E. Finney for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Crimmins, Kent, Bradley, Burns & Kaplan and Robert W. Williams for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

SIMS, J.

By its petition for writ of mandate and/or in the alternative writ of prohibition, the Hollister Canning Company sought an order staying proceedings in an action pending in the trial court until a peremptory writ could be granted herein ordering that court to set aside its order which granted the motion to strike the complaint as to the defendant "JAMES E. SWETT doing business as GEORGE E. SWETT COMPANY," who, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases