1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 60 N.J.
  5. 60 N.J. 142 (1972)
 

RUTGERS v. PILUSO

60 N.J. 142 (1972)

286 A.2d 697

RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STEPHEN PILUSO, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY, AND THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 24, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Angelo H. Dalto argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. Howard Gran, attorney; Mr. Dalto, on the brief).

Mr. Clyde A. Szuch argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, attorneys; Mr. Szuch and Mr. G. William Sisley, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HALL, J.

The question presented by this litigation is whether Rutgers, The State University, ("Rutgers") is subject to the zoning ordinance provisions of a municipality in which one of its campuses is located — here Piscataway Township, Middlesex County. Although the provision precisely involved is a limitation on the permissible number of housing facilities for student families, the broader issue necessarily present...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases