MARGULIS v. LINDSAY


31 N.Y.2d 167 (1972)

Anita Margulis et al., Appellants, v. John V. Lindsay, Individually and as Mayor of City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 7, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Zimmerman for appellants.

Otto M. Bonaparte, I. Stanley Stein, Gerald Davis, Edward L. Johnson and Jeanne Hollingsworth for Simeon Golar, respondent.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Alfred Weinstein, Norman Redlich and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for John V. Lindsay, respondent.

Herbert Kahn, Elliott M. Abramson and Robert Cammer for Queens Council for Better Housing and Community Development and others, amici curiae.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BERGAN, JASEN and GIBSON concur with Judge BREITEL; Judge SCILEPPI dissents and votes to reverse in a separate opinion.


BREITEL, J.

The issue in this case turns on the breadth of meaning of the term "project" in the Public Housing Law. Appellants attribute to the term "project" a particular meaning which would require resubmission for approval to the New York City Board of Estimate of a project modified since the prior approval by the board. Respondents, on the other hand, would give the term a broader and, therefore, a vaguer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases