1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 69 Misc.2d
  5. 69 Misc.2d 121 (1972)
 

GRUNTAL & CO. v. ENDICOTT JOHNSON CORP.

69 Misc.2d 121 (1972)

In the Matter of Gruntal and Co. et al., Petitioners, v. Endicott Johnson Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Broome County.

January 28, 1972

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herman Mark Harris for petitioners. Casey, Lane & Mittendorf for respondent.

CHARLES B. SWARTWOOD, J.

The petitioners Gruntal and Co., Dr. Bernard Heller and Baruch Ben Chaim Foundation, by petition and notice thereof, have initiated a proceeding in the nature of a special proceeding for an order determining that petitioners have satisfactorily complied with the provisions of section 623 of the Business Corporation Law with respect to 7,500 shares of Endicott Johnson Corporation held by petitioner Gruntal and Co., as nominee for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases