1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 23 Cal.App.3d
  5. 23 Cal.App.3d 165 (1972)
 

OAKLAND MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT v. CITY OF OAKLAND

Docket No. 28561.

23 Cal.App.3d 165 (1972)

100 Cal. Rptr. 29

OAKLAND MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT LEAGUE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

January 28, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, Christopher D. Burdick and J.D. Burdick for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Edward A. Goggin, City Attorney, and David A. Self, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

DEVINE, P.J.

A petition for writ of mandate and prohibition, in which plaintiffs sought to have the City of Oakland, its council and its city manager prevented from acting under its charter of 1969, having been dismissed by the superior court, plaintiffs appeal. They contend that the charter should be declared void because of defects in the process of enactment.

Plaintiffs are the Oakland Municipal Improvement League...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases