1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 56 Wis.2d
  5. 56 Wis.2d 129 (1972)
 

REDEPENNING v. DORE

No. 152.

56 Wis.2d 129 (1972)

201 N.W.2d 580

REDEPENNING and wife, Respondents, v. DORE and others, Appellants: AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 31, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Stafford, Rosenbaum, Rieser & Hansen and Richard A. Hollern, all of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Hollern.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by William E. Johnson of Madison.

BEILFUSS, J.

The defendants-appellants contend:

1. The verdict should be set aside and a new trial granted because (a) the verdict is contrary to the evidence; (b) the verdict is perverse as a result of passion and prejudice; and (c) it is required in the interest of justice.

2. The jury awards in several questions on damages are excessive and should be reduced with an option of a new trial to plaintiffs-respondents.

In Powers v. Allstate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases